SCOTUS Got It Right

Listening to the media pundits calling the Supreme Court decision against racial gerrymandering an “apocalyptic event” is just preposterous. In 1965, when the Voting Rights Act was proposed, the nation was 85% white. It is now 59% and falling. Carving out racially “equitable” congressional districts is absurd and blatantly unconstitutional. Where do we draw the line?  Does every minority group require its own congressional district to assure one of its own is elected?  Well, isn’t that happening naturally?  How is it possible that obviously unqualified, but candidates socially and politically representative of their constituency, like AOC, Omar, Tlaib, and DeLauro, get elected? Progressive Latina, Somali, Muslim, and just plain stupid appear to be adequately represented on the left. And, coincidentally, why is it that the law overwhelmingly tipped the scales towards Democratic candidates?  And shame on the Wall Street Journal for printing an article claiming that the democrats are finally standing up for themselves with their recent gerrymandering push in states like Virginia and California, claiming that the Republicans started the whole brouhaha in Texas. Uh, no. The Democrats have been at this for decades, unreported by the media, with the most egregious offenses in blue states like Massachusetts, Illinois, and California in particular, who responded to the issue by doubling down and making their gerrymandering worse, disenfranchising rural voters entirely. And Texas didn’t start the war; they were responding to New York’s redistricting efforts that eliminated Republican seats. Spin, spin, and more spin. And this doesn’t even take into account the fact that the apportionment of seats should be reflective of the population, which was ignored during the Biden administration when the census reported a population shift to red states and disputed figures regarding the inclusion of illegal immigrants were in the tallies. The democrats were seeking to bludgeon traditionally red districts with an influx of illegal immigrants. Recall the distribution of where the immigrants were being “relocated” under the Biden Administration and the scuffle that ensued when Texas Governor Abbott shipped them to Obama’s neighborhood on Martha’s Vineyard.  This is nothing but a multi-pronged power grab initiated by the democrats with the strategy to boost their representation in Congress with a campaign to vilify the Trump Administration, support illegal immigration and open border policies, promote amnesty for illegal immigrants, flood Republican strongholds with democrat voters, gerrymander states under democrat rule, and dilute voter registration requirements. And all of this with the unwavering support of the leftist media. Diabolical. But with some Republicans finally recognizing what’s at stake,  the democrats may have started a war that they can’t win. 

Democrat Agenda

The Democrats' long-game agenda takes precedence over any obvious benefit to America. It seems apparent that they want to destroy America as we know it and remake it into a European-style welfare state. Trump sees them for what they are and is a major impediment to their polices, thus the vitriol. I note 40% of children in Vienna public schools are Muslim. We are witnessing the death of European culture in real time. Is that where we are headed? Like the SPLC, are they cheering for the demise of Christianity, the Caucasian majority in this country? 

SCOTUS Diluted

How the Democrats have diluted the Supreme Court’s intelligence through DEI practices is truly deplorable. I’m not a huge fan of Coney-Barrett and and I will even give Kagan a pass, partisan as she is, I think she has a functioning cortex. And, Roberts recent interpretations of the Constitution gives one pause. Jackson and Sotomayor have no business being there. Intellectual lightweights blinded by partisanship

Please Leo Relent

Christianity is being attacked all over the world. The number of practicing Catholics has been falling precipitously in traditionally Christian European countries and the United States for decades. Yet, Pope Leo decides to criticize Trump for his incursion into the Middle East?  Turning the other cheek and preaching pacifism are grand ideals. Still, with Islam on the march and oppressive regimes seeking to expand their spheres of influence, your time would be better served addressing the China-Russia-North Korea-Iran axis, rather than criticizing America, which seeks to police the world’s bad actors as opposed to being on the march for territorial domination. And who are the world’s leading sponsors of terrorism?  And who has a history of abusing basic human rights and the oppression of their civilian populations?  

The Opaque Verses The Transparent

The Democrats are always screaming about wanting a transparent administration, but never deliver when they have one of their own in the White House; they couldn’t be more opaque. Yet here they have the most transparent, communicative, accessible president in our history, and they can’t stand it. Forever finding fault with his every legislation,  executive order, and diplomatic effort. TDS inflection has permeated every segment of the NDP. Twice impeached and always threatened for yet further prosecution. But The Donald persists, with nearly daily exposure to their wrath, Q&Aing with the Press and the public at the drop of a hat, always candid, vulnerable to misinterpretation in his spontaneity, but never any doubt of how he stands on any issue or relationship. Yes, he sometimes comes across as insensitive, brash, and arrogant, but always sincere in what he feels is best for our country, for we the people.

Bankrupt Media

After I nearly punched the radio yesterday, listening to some supercilious European bureaucrat pontificate on his definition of what constitutes Trump’s war crimes, while totally ignoring Iran’s haphazard discharge of missiles into civilian populations and using women and children as human shields. Please, spare me.  It is a no-win proposition for Trump. If Iran fails to cut a deal, and Trump follows through with his threats, he is a war criminal. If he backs off, the media will spin it into their TACO narrative: Trump always chickens out. The media is either working for Iran or, in their fever dream stupor from advanced TDS, believes that opposing all things Trump will return their progressive candidates to office, which is somehow better for the country. As if they can rationalize protecting the enemy’s interests in a war as a morally superior position when, in fact, the underlying goal is to impair the political opposition to support the opinion that we need to continue our inexorable slide into socialism by electing leftist candidates. Yeah, there’s that. Look at them trumpet their win in the Wisconsin Supreme Court race, as well as promote their performance in a Georgia special election race where a Democrat cut Trump’s margin in “the state's reddest district”…despite still losing. That’s right, the democrat lost the race, but Politico is spinning it as a win because he didn’t lose by as much. I had to read it twice after the headline praised the results as a “wow” moment. Wow, indeed. As in wow, I can’t believe our media is so blatantly biased.

Tell Me It Isn’t So

Is this the Democrats' endgame? Open the borders, flood the country with illegals, give them the right to vote, 85% of which will vote Democrat, pack the courts, make PR and DC states to add four  Democrat senators and five seats in the House, turn the red enclaves blue with immigration, more and more social programs to control our health and maintain government dependency, disarm the general population, create a socialist utopia and the elite ruling class will live like the very kings they supposedly protest against. Seems inevitable that we will go the way of Europe, failed empires destroyed by liberal socialist policies, complacent citizens, and unfettered immigration. If so, it lends a new dimension to diabolical.