Election Irregularities

 Where did they go?  Where are all the people who, under oath and under threat of perjury, filed affidavits attesting to election irregularities in the 2020 election?  I heard their testimony and they were credible.  They weren’t conspiracy theorists or right wing radicals, nor were they insurrectionists or seditionists, as the mainstream media would brand them.  What about their treasure trove of information regarding changes in state voter laws, violations of established laws, accounts of computer glitches, the counting of ballots that arrived after deadlines, the video of suitcases of ballots that emerged from under desks, the pallets of ballots shipped across state lines, the destruction of envelopes that provided signature matches, the ballots that contained the same birthdates, the ballots submitted from non-residents, the ballots submitted by the deceased, the ballots without legible postmarks, the military ballots that were “mistakenly” destroyed, the 10000 ballots mailed out unsolicited in New York City, the voters turned away at the polls because they had already voted by mail, the removal of election observers to positions where they couldn’t observe, the closing down of polling places and removal of workers before counting was complete…..to name but a few.  Was any of this ever investigated?  With half the public, and a majority of Republicans suspecting election fraud, why were these issues not addressed?  Wouldn’t it have actually been “a balm for a wounded nation” to provide evidence that this was indeed “the most secure election in American history” as trumpeted by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency.  Who exactly are these government drones anyway?  They can’t even keep the Pentagon from getting hacked, let alone your Macy’s card.  And as usual, our democrat friends across the aisle apparently have no capacity for long-term memory.  They were calling for impeachment within hours of Trumps inauguration and continued to bang that drum for four years effectively sabotaging his presidency from the start. As the National Review reported, in 2016, in another example of unbridled hypocrisy, Hillary Clinton used failed Green-Party candidate Jill Stein as a surrogate to sue Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania in an attempt to overturn the election results. The charge: voting machine irregularities.  You have to be kidding. This is particularly entertaining in light of the recent $2.7 Billion lawsuit filed by Smartmatics against FOX News for what CNN legal analyst Laura Coates called “the definition of defamation” stating that “there is real teeth to this”.  FOX has already responded by firing Lou Dobbs, a longtime Trump supporter and rigged voting machine theorist, in a move that appears to be partly appeasement in offering him up as a sacrificial lamb.  But if Lou had to go for dinging Smartmatics reputation, then surely Maria Bartiromo and Jeanine Pirro would be on the chopping block as well, and that does not appear to be the case.  Mr. Dobbs was an ardent supporter of election fraud claims and defended Trump protesters on the day of the “siege”, positions that appear to be politically inconvenient given the way the current DC winds are blowing.  But I digress.  It remains interesting that voting machine irregularities is a charge warranting an attack on FOX News today, when in 2016 we heard nary a peep when the democrats engaged in similar tactics, with significantly less evidence.  And by significantly less, I mean none.  Deeper pockets at FOX?  An attempt to silence more conservative opposition?  Or is this a case where offense is the best defense to cover something that might actually be there?  

And when the democrats failed in their first attempt to discredit the election results, they resorted to the Russian collusion theory that, based on a phony dossier produced by a foreign agent and paid for by the Clintons (sorry lefties, but that is fact, regardless of what you think of Hannity), produced the 22-month, $40 million Mueller investigation.  And by investigation, I mean sideshow.  With so little evidence, and evidence that in the end turned out to be illegally obtained and falsified, how were the democrats able to muster a costly investigation in 2016 when with mountains of evidence pointing to voting irregularities in 2020 the Republican charges have been met with disdain.  Rather than address the complaints, we have been subjected to cancel-culture tactics of suppression, ridicule and repeated claims by our government that the election was secure.  How exactly a mail in campaign by the democrats amounted to “most secure” remains a mystery of definition in that once the chain of custody is lost, so is the security.  Signature verification is realistically fanciful at best; so then how exactly can you precisely determine who filled out the ballot? Show me how the evidence is unfounded.  Explain to me how the video of suitcases appearing out of nowhere is not what it appears to be.  Tell me how stacks of ballots had the same birthdate, and how the birthdate could be in the year 1900.  If unity is your goal, Mr. Biden, then appease the 75 million Americans who think they were disenfranchised by explaining to them how these reports of irregularities have vanished without a trace.  And above all, with the claims of “most secure election in American history”, especially after the democrats railing about voting irregularities in the 2016 election, how is it that in 2020 Arizona, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania could not provide us with transparent election results.