Tuesday, June 14, 2022

Adding to the confusion

The recent WSJ editorial on the hearings wasn’t very defining. Although they scoff at the notion that this was an insurrection, they are quick to report that Trump incited it and did nothing to prevent it; although in circumspect, they seem, however, to favor the Democrats overall assertions. I’m getting tired of them and others dancing around the 2020 election results with semantics. On one hand, they tell us Biden received more votes than Obama, which seems improbable, especially when they report on, but fail to explain that there were voting “irregularities.” Then in the next breath, they claim that there is no evidence of voter fraud. It’s infuriating. Is there suspicion those so-called “irregularities” gave Biden the win or not?


No comments:

Post a Comment